Navy Question
Printed From: HairBoutique.com
Category: Hair Talk Forum Name: General Hair Talk Forum Description: A free wheeling discussion of hair related topics. URL: /forum_posts.php?TID=5334
Printed Date: Dec 26, 2024 at 9:45am
Topic: Navy Question
Posted By: PotatosMcGee Subject: Navy Question Date Posted: Dec 17, 2001 at 12:33am
My younger sister is joining the Navy next month, and among her concerns is what to do with her hair. She knows she`ll have to cut it, but she wants to know if she should do it now or let them. Her hair is real wavy and down past her shoulder blades. I have no idea wha to tell her, any advice?
-------------
|
Replies: 49 Posted By: PotatosMcGee
Date Posted: Dec 17, 2001 at 12:33am
My younger sister is joining the Navy next month, and among her concerns is what to do with her hair. She knows she`ll have to cut it, but she wants to know if she should do it now or let them. Her hair is real wavy and down past her shoulder blades. I have no idea wha to tell her, any advice?
|
Posted By: wozziewoo
Date Posted: Dec 17, 2001 at 1:33am
That really depends on what she wants. If she gets it cut beforehand she may have some say in what kind of style she gets. If she waits, she will just get the standard recruit haircut. Also if her hair was long enough & she wanted to do anything with it, such as keep it or donate it, she should get it cut beforehand, as she will have no option if she waits. Nevr having been in the military myself, there`s not much more I can say, I hope this helps.
|
Posted By: Waggy
Date Posted: Dec 17, 2001 at 3:53pm
I don`t know squat personally - I do have a friend who had to cut hers when she joined and then wore it waist length - she said you don`t have to cut it anymore - just wear it up...wags ! ) Q`cd`d ,,$0b /4 bp +.,,%!%!
|
Posted By: dsull
Date Posted: Dec 18, 2001 at 2:14am
Reply to message: viewthread.asp?forum=AMB%5FAP804060353&id=3154&page=1#21.3154.1 - 21.3154.1 Dear Potato:
Wags is quite correct.........your sister will NOT have to cut her hair, as long as she can demonstrate the ability to put it up in a secure updo........there are several such dos that are very quick and easy to maintain......Dennis$!%,
|
Posted By: Jennifer
Date Posted: Dec 18, 2001 at 8:59am
Reply to message: viewthread.asp?forum=AMB%5FAP804060353&id=3154&page=1#21.3162.1 - 21.3162.1 quote:
dsull originally wrote:
Reply to message: viewthread.asp?forum=AMB%5FAP804060353&id=3154&page=1#21.3154.1 - 21.3154.1 Dear Potato:
Wags is quite correct.........your sister will NOT have to cut her hair, as long as she can demonstrate the ability to put it up in a secure updo........there are several such dos that are very quick and easy to maintain......Dennis
>>>>your sister will NOT have to cut her hair, as long as she can demonstrate the ability to put it up in a secure updo........there are several such dos that are very quick and easy to maintain.
So much for "equal" rights -- men get no such choice.
Jennifer
|
Posted By: duke
Date Posted: Dec 18, 2001 at 12:27pm
Reply to message: viewthread.asp?forum=AMB%5FAP804060353&id=3154&page=1#21.3168.1 - 21.3168.1 Will she not have to cut it to a certain length during basic training? She`d better check with her recruiting office. Shouldn`t she get such information from them?
Yes, this is sexist. In the Netherlands, all soldiers can have long hair as long as they keep it secured in some way.
|
Posted By: dianefromcanada
Date Posted: Dec 18, 2001 at 6:00pm
Reply to message: viewthread.asp?forum=AMB%5FAP804060353&id=3154&page=1#21.3154.1 - 21.3154.1 Your younger sister must have had a manuel that tells her what they expect. They have diagrams that shows what is acceptable or not.$!!, B`gla`d`d
|
Posted By: dianefromcanada
Date Posted: Dec 18, 2001 at 6:06pm
Duke the training is pretty tense . I can`t understand how anyone would have time for their hair. Personally I don`t care what they do in Netherlands support your country for goodness sakes. Being a soldier in our country is something to be proud of and we have a good reputation in this world. Sorry but this is starting to bug me being a daughter of an army man. I personally find that having long hair in certain hostile environment only causes us to be more victims because the enemy can easily grab us. If you reallly studied what you are complaining about you will notice that women in the army in our country cannot have a certain lenght of hair and men do have some choices in hairstyles. $!!, B`gla`d`d
|
Posted By: Waggy
Date Posted: Dec 18, 2001 at 8:56pm
Nonsense - NOONE should have to cut their hair - it`s not required in Israel either. It has nothing to do with safety it`s just a stupid tradition that they are clinging to which serves no purpose now.
If the hair is a danger I`m sure the individual can decide that on their own and act accordingly...wags ! ) Q`cd`d ,,$0b /4 bp +.,,%!%!
|
Posted By: dianefromcanada
Date Posted: Dec 18, 2001 at 10:04pm
Well it is very obvious why haircutting wouldn`t be required in Israel, Waggy. Why would you bring that up? It doesn`t belong. IN everyday life we long hair people get in all kinds of embarrassing and funny situation like slamming the car door and leaving the hair out of the car etc. Filing cabinet, plastic plants grabbing our hair etc. Years ago we had a whole section on these situations and even Karen our webmaster can easilly tell you embarrassing funnymoments. Being a long hair woman myself I know how long hair could easily get in the way of duty.Why do you think that police women have only a certain length of hair? You will never see someone with knee lenght . I seriously can`t see the practicality of crawling around the bush, the woods, avoiding the enemy and fixing the hairbun all the way time and aiming all the same time. I don`t know how many times I can say that I have been caught by branches in the woods and I had a braid in my hair or I was caught because of my bun. We are talking about life or dealth. This is not fun and games. This is not videos games. These are people who have seriously taken their job to save their country seriously and fixing buns and fashions in the bush doesn`t belong. I happen to know lots of females in that sort of field. I`m around them and know what is involved. There is a time and place for everything. I am not going to bother with this any further. Obviously you never had long hair or you would understand. I enjoy wrestling, paint ball shooting and it is tough to just play and have long hair. I We will never agree as I see how obviously it is by experience. There is a reason to laws. It is easy to see that something isn`t neccessary when one never experience the reason to why the law exists.$!!, B`gla`d`d
|
Posted By: wozziewoo
Date Posted: Dec 18, 2001 at 11:36pm
I know it`s not exactly the same situation & it was a movie but has anyone here seen the movie GI Jane. That movie says it all about the situation. When she went in, no one made her do anything to it, but it got in the way & she took care of it herself. That`s ultimating why. I`m not sure why but flight attendants have a similar rule about hair lenght as well.
|
Posted By: duke
Date Posted: Dec 19, 2001 at 6:24pm
Reply to message: viewthread.asp?forum=AMB%5FAP804060353&id=3154&page=1#21.3179.1 - 21.3179.1 A fine muddle this thread is becoming! I thought men at least had to cut their hair in Israel, and that a draftee has decided to challenge this. I thought Canadian women did not have to cut their hair, but even if it can`t exceed a certain length, it sure can be long enough for a good bun.
Diane, I am VERY proud of our military, and our country, but there is always room for improvement. Rather than saying hair should be a certain length, why not do the same thing as the Netherlands and say hair can be any length if it can be held in place. Long hair can be put in a tight bun. (military women do it all the time). And say that you can`t do this and it has to be a certain length, like past the shoulders. Men should have the same right. I find it difficult to believe that wars can be lost just because you`re not required to have GI crewcuts!
I don`t know about policewomen. I think the mounties used to make you have short hair, for men at any rate, but changed the rules because Indians wanted to keep their traditional braids. I`d like to see that in the Canadian and American military, too. At any rate, crewcuts and buzzcuts are needless, and as for the idea of everyone being the same, your fatigues are enough for that. The military may require you taking orders, but it should not treat you like property or a robot. You`re not that, but a human.
There`s been another thread about flight attendants, and that I don`t understand. That obviously varies from airline to airline. It`s a wierd world we live in. Too many rules, even though were in the 21st century...
Diane, do you know about the style options for men in the CAF today? Do they have to have crewcuts/buzzcuts or at least tapered cuts? What about facial hair? I saw a picture of an American soldier in Afghanistan today, and he had a mustache and goatee. Kewl! Is this allowed now?
|
Posted By: duke
Date Posted: Dec 19, 2001 at 6:25pm
Oh, one more thing. Let your sister ask if she can put her hair under a shorter wig. That`s what a guy whose son`s stone-age school wanted him to cut his rat tail did when he was in the navy! :)
|
Posted By: Waggy
Date Posted: Dec 20, 2001 at 1:35am
Reply to message: viewthread.asp?forum=AMB%5FAP804060353&id=3154&page=1#21.3177.1 - 21.3177.1 `Xcuse me - but first ??? "posted on 18-Dec-2001 10:04:11 PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to message: 21.3176.1 Well it is very obvious why haircutting wouldn`t be required in Israel, Waggy. Why would you bring that up? It doesn`t belong. What the heck is that supposed to mean - I brought it up because it`s true - and why is it "obvious" - it`s not "obvious" to me. And Pardon me but I`ll decide what I think belongs.
As to my hair - you don`t know me from Adam - and you are wrong to boot.
WoozieWoo - I think you have it on the nose - if it becomes a problem people will take care of it as they see fit themselves. We don`t need regulation imposed by other for situations that don`t have any sense and are there simply as a way of bullying and throwing unnecessary weight at the people. Keep to what is important...wags ! ) Q`cd`d ,,$0b /4 bp +.,,%!%!
|
Posted By: Van
Date Posted: Dec 20, 2001 at 9:16pm
my best friend joined the army a few years ago, and the army has much higher standards and rules then the navy does (as i know people in both branches) in basic training, when your officers tell you to get ready, and you have 4 minutes to do so. if she can put her hair up in a bun in this amount of time along with getting dressed properly, then she doesnt have to cut it. however, if she doesnt want to do that, girls hair has to be above the collar if they want to wear it down during basic. so a cute bob would do and still has many ways of styling it. as for after basic, they can have it any way they want to. i know girls with waiste length hair in the army. hope this helps.
|
Posted By: Van
Date Posted: Dec 20, 2001 at 9:18pm
oh yeah, if she does choose to cut it, have her do it now, for when she joins any haircuts will be performed quickly and messy, ive heard horror stories.
|
Posted By: Jennifer
Date Posted: Dec 21, 2001 at 9:46am
Reply to message: viewthread.asp?forum=AMB%5FAP804060353&id=3154&page=1#21.3154.1 - 21.3154.1 It seems to me that the number 1 reason for serving in the military is to defend one`s country. That`s a very serious business. Part of the reason for uniform clothing and haircuts is to create a feeling of unity among the members. Individuality is a good thing in most instances, but in the military, it`s the cohesiveness of the unit that is largely responsible for its success. You have to work together as a team -- that includes wearing the same outfits and haircuts. Quite honestly, anyone who is so attached to his hair that he can`t bare to cut it probably shouldn`t be in the military. It isn`t a beauty contest! Don`t get me wrong, I LOVE long hair and am a strong supporter of it! But in the military, it`s an entirely different business.
Also, if women want men`s roles in the military, they should have to act like men -- and yes, that includes haircuts. You can`t just take the parts of "equal rights" that benefit one the most.
Long hair and styled hair quite frankly have no place in the deadly serious business of national security, in my opinion.
"Hold on!! The war can`t start now -- my hair isn`t put up in a bun yet!"
Jennifer
|
Posted By: duke
Date Posted: Dec 21, 2001 at 1:33pm
Yes, I see what you mean, Jennifer, but I must re-iterate, haircuts are not essential to this. How were wars won before hair was part of the dress code? You can`t force a feeling of unity, you can just try to stimulate it. At any rate, a basic uniform does this. I don`t care even about, like, the same color socks, but your hair is a part of your body, even if a renewable one. I don`t want the people who defend my country to be robots, just well-disciplined.
This attatched to your hair idea is also something that I take issue with. Aren`t you attatched to the color of your eyes, the length of your members, the shape of your nose etc? Disfigurements unfortunately do happen, but that doesn`t make people automatically not care about their body. I don`t care if hair is renewable. It still grows on your body and is part of you. No the army is not a beauty contest, but it shouldn`t feel a special license to be an uglification process.
I also think this is silly. Military personnel of either sex should act like "people", not like "men". Just as I think it`s unfair to give female soldiers buzzcuts, so I think, as said above, that men should be allowed long hair, as long as you put it up.
Fun fact: in the British army, from somewhere in the 18th century until 1809, you had to have long hair which you`d braid and at least on ceremonial occasions, you had to put this sloppy pomade on it and powder it with flour or something, as if you were a "gentleman of quality". If your hair was not long enough for this, in at least one regiment, you had to acquire an extension the same color as your hair., and attatch it. So why don`t we stay away from extremes, and enforce only those hair rules that are absolutely necessary? :) :D :)
|
Posted By: Waggy
Date Posted: Dec 21, 2001 at 3:16pm
Reply to message: viewthread.asp?forum=AMB%5FAP804060353&id=3154&page=1#21.3201.1 - 21.3201.1 Ah Jennifer, you said "posted on 21-Dec-2001 9:46:52 AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to message: 21.3154.1 It seems to me that the number 1 reason for serving in the military is to defend one`s country. "
That is not correct. REasons are - it is required (in some countries) and it`s a good career move (in most countries).
Most people who join the military never see combat. Most countries don`t even allow women into combat.
And as DUKE pointed out so well - in most countries the same goes for men as women and in the US it`s really just a tradition that makes no actual sense...wags
| |